Jump to content

Cartesian fibration

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Cartesian morphism)

In mathematics, especially homotopy theory, a cartesian fibration is, roughly, a map so that every lift exists that is a final object among all lifts. For example, the forgetful functor

from the category of pairs of schemes and quasi-coherent sheaves on them is a cartesian fibration (see § Basic example). In fact, the Grothendieck construction says all cartesian fibrations are of this type; i.e., they simply forget extra data. See also: fibred category, prestack.

A right fibration between simplicial sets is an example of a cartesian fibration.

Definition

[edit]

Given a functor , a morphism in is called -cartesian or simply cartesian if the natural map

is bijective.[1][2] Explicitly, thus, is cartesian if given

  • and

with , there exists a unique in such that .

Then is called a cartesian fibration if for each morphism of the form in D, there exists a -cartesian morphism in C such that . [3]

A morphism between cartesian fibrations over the same base S is a map (functor) over the base; i.e., . Given , a 2-morphism is an invertible map (map = natural transformation) such that for each object in the source of , maps to the identity map of the object under .

This way, all the cartesian fibrations over the fixed base category S determine the (2, 1)-category denoted by .

Note some authors require a morphism between cartesian fibrations to preserve cartesian morphisms but this requirement seems to be related to requiring fibers to be groupoids (and that’s why this condition is not required above).

Basic example

[edit]

Let be the category where

  • an object is a pair of a scheme and a quasi-coherent sheaf on it,
  • a morphism consists of a morphism of schemes and a sheaf homomorphism on ,
  • the composition of and above is the (unique) morphism such that and is

To see the forgetful map

is a cartesian fibration,[4] let be in . Take

with and . We claim is cartesian. Given and with , if exists such that , then we have is

So, the required trivially exists and is unqiue.

Note some authors consider , the core of instead. In that case, the forgetful map is also a cartesian fibration.

Grothendieck construction

[edit]

Given a category , the Grothendieck construction gives an equivalence of ∞-categories between and the ∞-category of prestacks on (prestacks = category-valued presheaves).[5]

Roughly, the construction goes as follows: given a cartesian fibration , we let be the map that sends each object x in C to the fiber . So, is a -valued presheaf or a prestack. Conversely, given a prestack , define the category where an object is a pair with and then let be the forgetful functor to . Then these two assignments give the claimed equivalence.

For example, if the construction is applied to the forgetful , then we get the map that sends a scheme to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on . Conversely, is determined by such a map.

Lurie's straightening theorem generalizes the above equivalence to the equivalence between the ∞-category of cartesian fibrations over some ∞-category C and the ∞-category of ∞-prestacks on C.[6]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Kerodon, Definition 5.0.0.1.
  2. ^ Khan, Definition 3.1.1.
  3. ^ Khan, Definition 3.1.2.
  4. ^ Khan, Example 3.1.3.
  5. ^ Khan, Theorem 3.1.5.
  6. ^ An introduction in Louis Martini, Cocartesian fibrations and straightening internal to an ∞-topos [arXiv:2204.00295]

Further reading

[edit]