Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Donald Trump announcing tariffs
Donald Trump announcing tariffs

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

Archives

[edit]

Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives

Sections

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


April 3

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations


April 2

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Sports


(Posted) Trump Tariffs

[edit]
Article: Tariffs in the second Trump administration (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ US President Donald Trump imposes sweeping trade tariffs on most countries. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ US President Donald Trump declares a national emergency to announce tariffs on all imports.
News source(s): NBC News
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Obviously the main story globally for the last several days and probably for the next few. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025-April-02-Reciprocal tariffs (left half)
Trump showing a chart with reciprocal tariffs (shame about the teleprompter)
Support This is basically tariffs on every country in the world from the richest country in the world. Beyond notable, regardless of impact. Personisinsterest (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tariffs will continue until morale improves, apparently. Article looks comprehensive and economic implications are massive. Bremps... 22:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I can't help but wonder if an article for these "Liberation Day" tariffs might not be warranted. I suppose that'll have to come as the impacts make themselves more apparent. BSMRD (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably why we should wait to see what international actions are done because more likely a 2025 international trade war would be the best target Masem (t) 23:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support, this is a massive world event, and I'd even support a separate article about just these tariffs. User:Chorchapu (talk|edits|commons|wiktionary|simple english) 23:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support/Wait Due to the scale of these tariffs. This affects nearly every important country on the world stage. However, we should probably wait a day or two to see the international response as Masem and PrimalMustelid suggested. Hungry403 (talk) 02:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Lots of people were watching this, and it's not just politics since business decisions are also affected. In fact I remember reading that for many CEOs, April 2 (aka "Liberation Day") couldn't come quickly enough. Unless the tariffs are walked back on soon, this will affect billions upon billions of goods and services; I don't see why that would not be worth posting. Banedon (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support One of the biggest economies in the world making sweeping tariffs, which will have huge impact on the global economy. Harizotoh9 (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Will have enormous global ramifications, very clearly meets the ITN threshold. Mlb96 (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: This will absolutely impact the global economy, and poses a significant issue. Support a different blurb than the current suggested blurb as it feels too general. Tofusaurus (talk) 05:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Posted. El_C 05:51, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Push back Not seeing a consensus for this but so it goes. What I do see is that there's already pushback for this in the Senate. You see, the President doesn't have complete freedom to do as he pleases with tariffs. Trump is abusing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act which is supposed to be for "unusual and extraordinary" cases, not a global policy affecting all trade. If there's an economic emergency, it will be of Trump's making! Anyway, the point is that this is an ongoing situation in which pushback is happening both domestically and internationally. The blurb presents it as a done deal when it's just the start. Andrew🐉(talk) 06:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The Senate bill is not expected to pass the house according to analysts but we'll have to wait and see. Yes, Congress could close the loopholes that Trump is using, but they haven't yet. Harizotoh9 (talk) 07:22, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, obviously I judged there being consensus (at the very least a WP:ROUGHCONSENSUS), so I will not be doing that. El_C 07:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    At the time of posting there were 12 supports, 2 opposes, and 3 waits. Of course it's not a vote and strength of argument counts, but there was clearly a consensus in favour of posting. I do think it would have been better to wait a few hours, so editors in Europe had a chance to comment (this all happened overnight for them). Modest Genius talk 11:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    What needs work now is the blurb so that it doesn't normalize the idea that Trump controls tariffs by diktat. The blurb currently doesn't explain that Trump has declared a national emergency in the US, as his pretext for this. To make this clearer, the blurb would be
US President Donald Trump declares a national emergency to announce tariffs on all imports.
Andrew🐉(talk) 08:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Getting into how Trump introduced tariffs when it is not normally within his power is getting into the weeds for the main page of a global encyclopedia (But obviously should be covered at the article). What the blurb is lacking is the impact. Its why we should wait to verify what other nations are likely to do, with the expectation it will start a trade war and potentially a recession/depression at a large scale (if not just in the US). Even seeing how bad the markets dive from this (based on overnight trading) would be something. Right now the blurb gives zero suggestions of its importance and only if you have been following the news do you know what that means. We shouldn't assume that for the readers. Masem (t) 12:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support. While there are some reasonable arguments above, this is undoubtedly headline news around the world. Deliberately causing economic damage to trading partners is a big deal. We can't post every tariff that Trump imposes, but collectively these are a large package that affects most of the world economy. It's good to keep the blurb simple too, without attempting to explain his stated reasons (or why they're bogus). Modest Genius talk 11:13, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting comment, should we consider mentioning the fact that stock markets across the world are plunging in response? User:Chorchapu (talk|edits|commons|wiktionary|simple english) 12:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Post-posting support. Whilst it's tempting to say "oh, it's just another on the list of stupid ideas that Trump thinks are cool", this one is genuinely worldwide front page news, for obvious reasons. And no, we shouldn't try to kick it into the long grass by saying "Wait for responses", the story is this, happening now. Black Kite (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Bill Cottrell

[edit]
Article: Bill Cottrell (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Detroit Free Press
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Death announced today. The NFL's first black center, and one of the first articles I'd written, back in 2020. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Khamtai Siphandone

[edit]
Article: Khamtai Siphandone (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Laotian Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Former president of Laos. Jmanlucas (talk) 18:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support- Page looks good and the guy is worthy for ITN LuxembourgFan42 (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Full enough article. Longest lived world leader ever. Doesn't meet Thatcher/Mandela criteria for ITN though. Bremps... 22:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Longest lived was Celâl Bayar. Curbon7 (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Chinese landing barges

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: PLA Navy landing barges (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ China starts testing invasion barges which extend bridges to form a pier. (Post)
News source(s): NYT, US Naval War College, CNN, Naval News
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: These new barges are being tested on China's south coast currently and these seem more significant than the current exercises around Taiwan. The barges put down feet into the sea bed and then extend bridges to form a pier. These would enable fast roll-on/roll-off logistics for a naval invasion of places such as Taiwan. These seem as significant as the Mulberry harbours were for the D-Day invasion of Europe. Our article needs expansion but the US Naval War College paper has lots of good detail. What I've not found yet is a good free image but I'm just getting started after reading the electrifying article in the NYT. That's dated April 1st but this does not seem to be a joke. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's early days yet. I've just edited the article to add more sources and detail. There are lots of naval buffs on Wikipedia and I expect that they will do more as the news breaks. Watch this space... Andrew🐉(talk) 08:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and snow close - Weapons and equipment tests are not significant enough to warrant a blurb even when they strongly suggest impending invasion, and any suggestion that this will be used in any military operations is leaning into WP:CRYSTAL territory since it is not guaranteed that these things will be used as per my understanding, even though common sense says it is highly plausible. Tube·of·Light 08:53, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Interesting but not really of ITN significance (which itselfs derives from the crystalball of use in an invasion) as reflected by the blurb. Perhaps DYK. We did not post the minor Cross Strait crisis around an year ago, these developments are even less significant. Gotitbro (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Militaries test new equipment all the time. If these landing craft are used in an actual invasion, then we can post. Merely trialling them isn't significant enough. DYK might be a possibility, but the article would require expansion to meet their requirements. Modest Genius talk 10:32, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The beginning of tests of a technology is obviously not ITN material. GenevieveDEon (talk) 11:47, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose not ITN material. Secretlondon (talk) 12:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. A military exercise is not ITN-worthy.
675930s (talk) 13:31, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Huge Oppose; please SNOW it. It is not much of an event . Yet RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 14:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Najmuddin Shaikh

[edit]
Article: Najmuddin Shaikh (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): DAWN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 Ainty Painty (talk) 03:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, missing sources LuxembourgFan42 (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 1

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Science and technology


RD: Johnny Tillotson

[edit]
Article: Johnny Tillotson (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): People
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American country singer-songwriter. 240F:7A:6253:1:C807:43E1:28B4:4DD (talk) 01:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Mark Laforest

[edit]
Article: Mark Laforest (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Toronto Sun, TSN, American Hockey League
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Canadian ice hockey goaltender. Article doesn't have any CN tags, nor any other glaring issues at first glance. The Kip (contribs) 21:01, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Career stats need to be cited. Bremps... 00:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bremps common practice in WP:NHL is to source stats from the “Biographical information and career statistics from…” sources listed under “External links” (ex. Eliteprospects, HockeyDB, NHL.com, etc), without a direct link in the table. The Kip (contribs) 01:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: George Freeman (guitarist)

[edit]
Article: George Freeman (guitarist) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chicago Tribune
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American jazz guitarist. 240F:7A:6253:1:5B2:5A14:8151:B74 (talk) 07:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If the discography serves as its own citation, then count this as a support vote. Article in GA quality. Bremps... 00:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Val Kilmer

[edit]
Article: Val Kilmer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Really sad. Enjoyed his performances. The article has citing issues, and his death category could use some more. AndrewGarfieldIsTheBestSpiderMan (talk) 04:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as soon as the article polishing is ready. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support: our man here was popular enough to be remembered. But article needs hefty work to be nominated. RΔ𝚉🌑R-𝕏 (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Still a lot of citation needed tags, and a few uncited and untagged paragraphs in the Career section. Departure– (talk) 14:56, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll say that I strongly oppose a blurb - the article does NOT tell me why they were notable beyond saying they were in big movies. Departure– (talk) 17:12, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support one of the big box-office draws in the later half of the 1980s and early 1990s though article needs work.
SpacedFarmer (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's Val Kilmer, not much more to think through here. If whoever Betty Webb was can go up, he can too. Tidy up the article for sure, but the minute that's done, play ball. Xanblu (talk) 17:03, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For the love of god, Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD. The Kip (contribs) 17:54, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not WP:BITE. BangJan1999 18:47, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Photo distinction maybe? BilboBeggins (talk) 23:05, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly oppose article as it stands now. Big orange tag at top. Scuba 13:36, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I realize there is a "big orange tag" on the article, but I don't understand why it is there. Kilmer's article has 112 citations. This sadly is the norm at now for recent deaths, where editors are demanding more sources than required by Wikipedia policies, and prevents longer articles like this from getting to the main page while allowing stubby articles to make it on much easier. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the big orange tag at the top. It seems to apply only to the filmography section (which already has a tag). I added a bunch of references based on Associated Press' article but I don't have time to sift through every single film and TV show (especially the smaller productions) to find all references. I support RD but reserve my judgement on blurb. OhanaUnitedTalk page 16:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Betty Webb

[edit]
Article: Betty Webb (code breaker) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Elderly UK Bletchey Park code-breaker Martinevans123 (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support: no issues and is worthy for being under RD LuxembourgFan42 (talk) 22:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Gas Pipeline Explosion in Malaysia

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2025 Putra Heights pipeline fire (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A natural gas pipeline explodes (pictured) in Putra Heights, Selangor, Malaysia, injuring 305 people and causing the destruction of at least 190 houses and 159 vehicles (Post)
News source(s): The Star
Credits:

Article needs updating
 sherm (talk) 11:58, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not Ready References are badly messed up, only 2 citations in the lead paragraph. This needs alot of fixing. Shaneapickle (talk) 12:51, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Though the incident had garnered some worldwide attention, I don't think it is notable enough for it to be in ITN. Furthermore the article content need to be reworked Syn73 (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose background section has no sources. Besides that, with no deaths and seemingly not-wildly-extensive property damage, I don't really think this rises to the level of ITN. The Kip (contribs) 14:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not enough sources and with no deaths or massive damage. It isn't worthy of ITN LuxembourgFan42 (talk) 22:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) China imposes temporary blockade on Taiwan

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Cross-strait relations (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ China imposes temporary blockade on Taiwan (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Article needs updating
 Count Iblis (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose run of the mill military exercise. Scuba 10:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose until bombs start falling on Taipei, per all above. Departure– (talk) 12:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. These are military exercises in international waters. They're certainly provocative, and China is doing a lot of sabre-rattling today, but it's far from the act of war implied by the nomination. Also, there is zero update in the linked article, and that's too broad a topic anyway - I would expect a stand-alone article to be written before nomination for ITN. Modest Genius talk 13:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close or preferably, Withdraw If something changes significantly, feel free to nominate again once the target article has been updated. Jehochman Talk 13:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and SNOW close So what, average day in the Taiwan strait. Editor 5426387 (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) NBA fight

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Minnesota Target (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A violent altercation broke out during an NBA game on March 31, 2025 between the Minnesota Timberwolves and the Detroit Pistons at Target Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The incident, which drew comparisons to the 2004 Malice at the Palace, resulted in the ejection of 6 players and 2 coaches. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ A fight between multiple coaches and players from the Minnesota Timberwolves and Detroit Pistons resulted in Donte DiVincenzo (guard), Naz Reid (center), Timberwolves assistant coach Pablo Prigioni, Ron Holland (basketball) (forward), Isaiah Stewart (center), Marcus Sasser (guard), and Pistons head coach J.B. Bickerstaff. being ejected.
Alternative blurb II: Detroit Pistons: Ron Holland (basketball) (forward), Isaiah Stewart (center), Marcus Sasser (guard), and head coach J.B. Bickerstaff. And, sparked debates on player conduct and security measures in the National Basketball Association.
News source(s): [1][2][3][4][5]
Credits:

Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: A fight between multiple different players and head coaches in the Minnesota Timberwolves and the Detroit Pistons in the National Basketball Association is going viral through the media. And, is drawing comparisons to the 2004 Malice at the Palace incident. CostalCal (talk) 02:54, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, fights always happen at sporting events. 675930s (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

March 31

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


(Posted) Marine Le Pen convicted

[edit]
Proposed image
Articles: Marine Le Pen (talk · history · tag) and National Rally assistants affair (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Three time French presidential candidate Marine Le Pen is convicted on charges of embezzlement and barred from seeking public office for five years. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Marine Le Pen, the runner up in the 2022 French presidential election, is convicted of embezzlement and banned from standing in elections for five years
News source(s): CNN, Le Monde
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: The most popular politician in France(by some measures) and likely candidate again, convicted of a crime and prevented from running for president in 2027 seems worth including. 331dot (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it would benefit from more than one paragraph on this. There's no detail. She was sentenced to prison - was that suspended? We only cover the conviction. Secretlondon (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The details concerning MLP have been added to her BLP. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 21:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose criminal getting sentenced is hardly big news. It's not in the news worldwide either, even here in the US with all the surge of popularity of certain far-right/fascist/neo-nazi politicians, i had to scroll all the way to the middle to find a mention of hers on the https://www.nytimes.com/ 2A02:C6C1:A:28E:0:0:0:22 (talk) 13:08, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's the top story on the BBC News right now, with an accompanying 'unfolding story' page. GenevieveDEon (talk) 13:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Don't suppose "politician is a criminal" is news any more? Martinevans123 (talk) 13:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Polling has her winning both the first round and the second round of the presidential election. She's no ordinary criminal. 331dot (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well if she's been barred from running until 2030 then she can't... Aydoh8[contribs] 14:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's kind of the point of why this is important...? User:Chorchapu (talk|edits|commons|wiktionary|simple english) 21:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Convictions have been posted on ITN before.Sportsnut24 (talk) 14:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's very big in the UK. Secretlondon (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose on notability for now - Le Pen was the frontrunner in French right-wing politics and a conviction like this was unexpected to me - but since they were never properly in office, I can't give my full support as I would to, say, Trump. Departure– (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Needs work There's a specific article about this matter: National Rally assistants affair. The article about Marine Le Pen doesn't work for me currently -- it causes Chrome to crash when I try to open it.
And I don't like the proposed blurb as it just calls the offence embezzlement when it seems more political/technical than that. It's not clear why the people that they nominated as assistants were not acceptable.
Andrew🐉(talk) 13:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sources use the word "embezzlement" or "embezzled EU funds" so that's why I did. 331dot (talk) 13:34, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Embezzlement to me suggests personal gain whereas this seems to be more of a party matter as Le Pen is just one of 21 party officials who have been caught violating some technicality. It doesn't seem to be a hand-in-the-till kind of thing. Andrew🐉(talk) 19:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Misappropriation would probably be less confusing, as basically the people paid (by the EU) to work at the EU parliament were working at the National Front party HQ on national politics and campaigning. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 21:59, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem linking to the article about the scandal itself instead of Le Pen. 331dot (talk) 13:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per 2A02:C6C1:A:28E:0:0:0:22 Shaneapickle (talk) 13:41, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose there is no target article for the arrest, therefore not ITN worthy. Scuba 14:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure where that's a requirement, but I've already said we can link to the article about the scandal itself. 331dot (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that would alleviate some of my concerns. Scuba 16:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
obvious oppose knew it'd be nominated. It is in the news, but there's also an appeal pending and it's sub-national. doubt we'd post former potf sarkozy due soon.Sportsnut24 (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
it's not sub-national, it's national. Secretlondon (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sportsnut24 We don't wait for all appeals to be exhausted (which can take years) before posting a conviction. It'd be stale at the end of that time. It's not "sub-national". She is a national figure. When Trump was convicted by the State of New York, that was posted even though New York is "sub-national". Sarkozy has already been convicted of crimes. 331dot (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose She's not an ex-President and there's still a legal route of appeal. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This is akin to keeping Donald Trump out of the 2024 election beforehand(which was attempted and failed). She's the leading candidate in the polls(in the first and second round). We don't wait for all appeals to be exhausted before posting something; it would be stale at the end of that time("should have posted it when it happened!"). I'm not understanding most of the resistance here; I guess ITN is getting away from me. 331dot (talk) 14:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not understanding the lack of consistency too. Recent examples of postings include the arrest of the Turkish mayor, the arrest of the South Sudanese VP and the arrest of the Philippines former president. Those all seemed quite political and they were arrests not convictions. This French matter seems quite political too but at least it's a conviction, not just an arrest. Andrew🐉(talk) 15:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Stop leaving out the context! They have justified notability and not just political disagreement reasons
    1. the arrest of Ekrem İmamoğlu, the mayor of Istanbul was an example of Turkey’s democratic backsliding under Erdogan, which also exploded into the massive 2025 Turkish protests. Hence the notability.
    2. South Sudanese VP arrest marked an end to the South Sudanese Civil War ceasefire agreeement.
    3. Rodrigo Duterte’s arrest by the ICC was part of a larger investigation of his regime’s violent war on drugs that costed many lives. It was also notable as he was the first Asian leader ICC arrest.
    I swear, most of the time I read your comments it is almost lowkey, if not ragebait with the lack of context you keep missing out. SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 04:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Be careful what you wish for. The South Sudanese VP is worth saying more about because ITN has run a picture of him and his wife for several days now, as if they are the most important couple in the world; even more important than the big earthquake which is the actual top blurb. This is remarkable because nobody actually cares about this guy or even knows who he is. They couldn't even tell you much about South Sudan and its politics because they get almost no coverage in the news. The vice president that has actually been all over the news lately is JD Vance – visiting Greenland, making waves in Signalgate, picking fights with Zelensky, Europe and the rest of the world. But he is getting zero coverage on ITN because he's American. Marine Le Pen stands a chance of being posted because she's not American but is getting opposition because people have heard of her and she's from a major country that they have heard of too. Is that enough context for you or would you like some more? Andrew🐉(talk) 07:41, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    None of this takes away from the fact that the original convictions were not posted simply for being convictions. If you have a problem with the image take it up at errors, repeatedly bringing up the South Sudanese item in unrelated noms is an abuse of the process and disruptive at this point.
    And no we are not a news ticker and especially not for Trump and his cabinet.
    Your reply is also unnecessarily abrasive. Gotitbro (talk) 10:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This is an international project. Secretlondon (talk) 16:53, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    This is akin to keeping Donald Trump out of the 2024 election beforehand(which was attempted and failed).

    Let us not devolve ITN into baseless forumy gossip. Gotitbro (talk) 11:12, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Just as a comment, we know nearly every conviction will be appealed, but for purposes of ITN that initial conviction is sufficient evidence for posting, and if the conviction does get overturned we would also have reason to post that. (I believe we did that we Cosby recently). I'm not suggesting that's a reason to post this, but we should not let the fact that a conviction is getting appealed be reason to not post if all other considerations were met. Masem (t) 15:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Worth nothing that, per Reuters, "Appeals in France can take months or even years", and "Le Pen's five-year public office ban cannot be suspended by appeal". Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 20:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It cannot be suspended during the appeal process, but of course it could be shortened or rescinded by a successful appeal. This is what happened with Juppé... -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 23:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support in principle - she came second in the most recent election, and opinion polls show her as having a good chance of winning the next one, so this isn't some obscure politician. We do have a specific article about the case: National Rally assistants affair, however it's pretty brief at present. That article should be brought up to postable standard and used as the bold link. I've proposed an altblurb above. Modest Genius talk 15:10, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The article is still fairly brief but now of postable standard. Switching to full support. Modest Genius talk 10:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I'm actually surprised there is so much opposition to this. This is France - a G7 country, nuclear power, permanent member of the UN Security Council etc and Le Pen was leading the polls of prospective presidential candidates for 2027. There's always going to be a cloud over things like this as to whether they are in fact political stitch ups. As for appeals I don't see that as a reason not to post now, the conviction is already beyond all reasonable doubt and the bar from office is being applied from this point. I can't help but feel some of the opposition here is a pro-Anglophone bias and while that may be justifiable to some extent in our editorial decisions on the English Wikipedia this is a big story from a world power. 3142 (talk) 15:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability, as this is quite major news internationally, especially in context to both illiberal politics and Europe, both of which are some of the dominant topics of geopolitics. PrimalMustelid (talk) 15:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alternative blurb clearly important and got international attention, unlike original blub with attached article Braganza (talk) 16:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support altblurb It's an unusual event that is getting widespread global coverage in the reliable sources even outside of France - so, why not? As the IP address oppose votes itself points out, it is getting covered by the New York Times. But in case that wasn't enough, see also Times of India, Sydney Herald, Times of Israel, Toronto Star. All of those publications have not only the linked articles, but now multiple articles about the ramifications of this arrest. This should be blurbed. FlipandFlopped 16:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb – certainly in the news, and well covered in the article. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 17:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support altblurb - Major political figure in a G7 country, leading in polls for the next presidential election, finished second in 2022, now convicted and barred from office. Widely covered in international news media. --PJ Geest (talk) 17:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Le Pen article has a few unsourced statements. Also would suggest noting twelve others were also convicted in the same trial on the blurb. Masem (t) 18:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose. She's not a president or ex-president, so why is this notable enough for ITN? There are countless officials of actual executive governments who get convicted without receiving an ITN, and Marine Le Pen lacks even those political credentials.
675930s (talk) 18:32, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above additionally she is not a head of state and the event did not have a separate article.
QalasQalas (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
QalasQalas, Nominations do not necessarily need separate articles. Where did this incorrect notion appear from? I feel like I have seen it repeated a lot recently. Curbon7 (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Per most of the above. We don't post national political events other than elections or changes in heads of state/government. And she is/was neither. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:50, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not true, Ad Orientem. It's one thing to personally oppose national political events other than elections or changes in heads of state (a potentially defensible position), but objectively speaking, we've posted arrests, arraignments and convictions of major political figures many times in the past, including examples like Trump but also very recently some politicians from Turkey and Sudan. There's no ITN policy rule against it and it wouldn't be a deviation from standard practice to post this, so I don't think that's a fair rationale. FlipandFlopped 23:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ad Orientem Respectfully, you can't tell me that we wouldn't have posted Trump being kept out of the last presidential election. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I concede that Trump would probably have been posted, though I'm not sure I'd have supported. That said, Trump was an ex-president. Prominent opposition candidates are barred from seeking office all the time and are rarely noted here. As a criminal case, this was pretty paltry stuff. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:07, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This is most comparable to if Trump was convicted (in a political event) prior to his first election in 2016. Trump can't really be compared to Le Pen in this instance because Le Pen has been active in French politics for years whereas Trump was on the outside; Le Pen has been the face of the national rally for years, but was never the head of state or government like Trump was in his convictions. Departure– (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support – Leading candidate in the upcoming French presidential election barred from running. Le Pen is also internationally known, this has received international reactions and coverage. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 20:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose National politician who never held head of state/government position gets convicted of a crime. Yawn. We didn't post Trump's arrest for very similar reasons (which I would have opposed as well, despite him having held both positions in a country with far more media reach than France) – why is Le Pen different? Sure, it's in the news. But that's not what ITN is. Hold ourselves to our standards, please. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 20:54, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I hesitate to keep reminding people of this across this nom, but you are mistaken. Sure, we didn't post Trump's arrest, but we did post both his arraignment (twice, actually) and his conviction. This nom is for her conviction (similar to the Trump conviction we posted), and not an arrest. If we are "holding ourselves to our standards", we would therefore be posting this... FlipandFlopped 23:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support altblurb, she appears to have been the current favourite in the 2027 election before she was barred from running. User:Chorchapu (talk|edits|commons|wiktionary|simple english) 21:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- It is correct that the ban on running for office is effective immediately, whereas the 2 years of house arrest and loss of her lower house seat will not take effect until all appeals have been exhausted. It does appear she may lose her departmental council seat immediately, though that is not int'l news. The loss of eligibility for the 2027 presidential race could theoretically see the inside of an appeals court some weeks before the election, but running a campaign under such circumstances seems rather fraught. Cf. 20 minutes (in French)-- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 21:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Nothing prevented us from posting Navalny's conviction in Russia, so please hold ourselves to our standards and post this. Furthermore, she was leading the opinion polls for the next presidential election at the time of her conviction. It seems like there's a wave of harshly eliminating prospective presidential candidates from running for the office. Firstly, Georgescu was barred in Romania, then İmamoğlu was arrested and lost his university degree in Turkey, and now comes Le Pen's conviction in France. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Cf. Alain Juppé's ineligibility after his criminal conviction. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 23:03, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question Jog my memory, have we posted Trump being convicted (while not president), because as I see it this is a comparable situation. Kingsif (talk) 23:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Kingsif Yes, we did - for his state conviction in New York on May 30, 2024. We further posted his 2023 arraignment in the New York case as well as posted his 2023 indictment in the federal documents case. Unlike this conviction of Le Pen, none of those three actually had the immediate impact of barring him from running again for President in the next election. FlipandFlopped 23:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Former head of state is notable, but did we posted before 2016 earlier than he became president? QalasQalas (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, before 2016 isn't really a fair comparator, because he was not yet a politician nor was he the presidential candidate in a national election yet. Of course we would not be posting any blurbs about him, just like we would not be posting any blurbs about Le Pen for a period before she had even entered politics. A better comparison would be, if Trump had lost in 2016 and then been arrested some years later, would we post that? FlipandFlopped 23:25, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Criteria is simple: former head of state but not former runner-up, also failed separate article. QalasQalas (talk) 23:42, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I disagree, there's no hard policy rule against posting news related to high-profile runner ups (in fact if they're globally "in the news", then criteria would actually fully support posting like any other story), and the scandal from which this conviction stems does have a separate article, albeit which needs some expansion and translation work from its French-language equivalent. FlipandFlopped 00:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on quality The story is definitely in the news, but the target article is not yet in a state to be posted. Gust Justice (talk) 23:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Someone just added the expand from French template, which I agree with, but I also need sleep. zzzz.  :) (updated below) -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 23:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt-blurb. The entry dedicated to the affair is of reasonable quality thanks to the efforts of several people now. It still does not enter into the detail of the French page, but it's not clear to me that such detail is entirely desirable. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 06:56, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Let us not normalize Main Page as a bulletin for convictions, criminal investigations etc. I understand making crime BLP exceptions for heads of state and the like and blaring that on the front page but to do that for any political heavyweight is miguided, especially when no immediate consequences are present (any effect on 2027 elections is quite far out). I will have to say a no, ITN shouldn't be headed in this direction. Gotitbro (talk) 10:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This, giving her space on the mainpage is tantamount of advertising her and her party on the main page of one of the top 10 most popular websites in the world 2A02:C6C1:A:28E:0:0:0:22 (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Ad Orientem, and would like to voice my opposition to the Trump comparisons - he had already served a term as president when arrested/convicted, and the notability was in being the first American (former) head of state to become a convicted felon. Conversely, Le Pen has never served as French president (and hopefully never will...) The Kip (contribs) 14:31, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    On the contrary, I think the notability in Trump's case - I remember discussion vibes if not all outcomes - was that he was actively in the running for president while being convicted, much like Le Pen. If it was simply that he was a former office holder, and not seeking election, I am not sure his convictions would’ve been posted: instead of the intersection of convicted criminal/running for globally-significant office that is mirrored with Le Pen, he would just be any other private citizen with a criminal record. Kingsif (talk) 23:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support especially alt-blurb, Marine Le Pen is very much a key figure in French politics, and could've very likely won if she wasn't barred, despite not winning the presidency previously. I feel also the comparisons to other events is apt, and does establish precedent for this case. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 14:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
She was polling at 36%, sure she might've win the first round but as with 2017 and 2022 the entire french political scene would've rallied around her second round opponent. Saying that she 'could've very likely won' is disingenuous. Scuba 16:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The reality is that, right now, she was leading in the polls. Saying that her first-round victory wouldn't necessarily translate to a second-round victory is true, but to treat her winning the election as an impossibility is contrary to RSes and runs afoul of WP:CRYSTALBALL DecafPotato (talk) 21:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — The conviction of a prominent opposition politician (see Donald Trump) that bars the opposition candidate from running in the next presidential election (see Jair Bolsonaro) even though that person has not before held the office they have been banned from seeking (see Ekrem İmamoğlu and Alexei Navalny). DecafPotato (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Imamoglu was posted because of the protests not due to his arrest. Navalny's death was posted (death as a story) not his conviction. Gotitbro (talk) 01:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support We do post convictions when notable, and the case of an individual in the running (and a major candidate) for leadership of a G7 nation not only becoming a convicted criminal but this also barring them from the election, is empirically such a case. What has swayed me to a full support (rather than something qualified, as there are various world leaders and candidates - of less globally significant nations TBF - whose criminal status doesn’t touch the MP) is the precedent established by the posting of Trump being convicted while running for office. In the relevant ways, such offices and convictions are comparable. Kingsif (talk) 23:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The Trump case is fundamentally different; a former president convicted in an election year cannot be equated with the conviction of a presidential hopeful who's never held public office and who's prospectives for that post might be affected two years from now. My view would be the same if a major Democratic/Republican face for the next presidential election [Trump cannot run] were to be convicted now. Gotitbro (talk) 01:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
who's never held public office. I'm very surprised how many times this misinformation has been repeated in this discussion. She's holding two public offices right now and has obviously been an MEP in the past based on the nature of the conviction. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 09:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant by public officer/public official (and others who may have used the term here) is someone actually serving in/heading a government office/department/agency. Parliamentarian, deputy, councillor, party/faction head wasn't meant and often in common paralance isn't. And from what I can see Le Pen has never been a minister, government official or headed any government branch (executive or otherwise). This wasn't meant to be misinformation in the slightest. Gotitbro (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gotitbro I respect your opinion that the Trump case is fundamentally different, but it is just that - your opinion - and one I think my !vote makes it clear I disagree with. There may be differences but there are many relevant similarities (both things surely unarguable fact) and, to me, the similar intersection is what's fundamental to this 'type' of story being ITN-worthy. Again, you can disagree, but that's what my invocation of Trump precedent was saying. Kingsif (talk) 10:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I understand and see where the similarities maybe seen to lie on the face of it but my comment is based on the heft of the arguments used in the Trump posting (not one goes without mentioning that he was a former pres [at the time]). That is why I disagree in seeing a precedent there for this. Gotitbro (talk) 11:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 30

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology


RD: Reinaldo Herrera

[edit]
Article: Reinaldo Herrera (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Venezuelan aristocrat and journalist. NY Times obit published 30 March. Thriley (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm not sure the subject is notable per WP:INHERIT. Bremps... 02:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose written when they died. Sub-stub and looks non-notable. Secretlondon (talk) 12:17, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notwithstanding your other valid reason, BIOs being written after a subject has died is not a reason to oppose, and indeed many times the death of a person has been the motivating factor to create and/or improve perfectly legitimate if not necessary biographies. Kingsif (talk) 10:40, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality. Among the sources is a full RS obit, though, so there should be enough source info to better judge the notability even if just the one strong source (at the moment) probably won't fill out a bio alone. Kingsif (talk) 10:40, 3 April 2025 (UTC) Procedural oppose: NY Times may have posted their obit on 30 March, but his death was published in English-language media on 19 March People, so this is stale. Kingsif (talk) 10:49, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 29

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Richard Chamberlain

[edit]
Article: Richard Chamberlain (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3v9xzw09z0o
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American actor. Fdfexoex (talk) 16:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Support The article is well-cited, to the exception of his filmography section, which for the most part is missing accompanying footnotes for all of his listed television or movie appearances. However, for the vast majority of the entries, there is a hyperlink to the corresponding Wiki article which in turn is well-referenced. It would be ideal if the handful of entries without a hyperlinked wiki article (on account of the film either not passing GNG or not having an article yet), at least had a citation though. With this being said, it's a good enough quality article and this issue is relatively minor. FlipandFlopped 19:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not Ready for the usual reason. The tables in particular are in rough shape. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:56, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Solar eclipse of March 29, 2025

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Solar eclipse of March 29, 2025 (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The first solar eclipse of 2025 is visible from much of Europe and North America. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera, BBC, CNN, NASA, Times of Israel
Credits:
 Wikihmdmner (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Wikihmdmner}[reply]
  • However, when we have posted eclipses in the past, such as Solar eclipse of April 8, 2024 (And specifically considering the state at the end of the day, [2]) shows that a lot more information about the current eclipse should be present. Further from that old version, this massive section on related eclipses has grown massively since last year. Masem (t) 17:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose I don't see anything distinguishing this in any real way from any other eclipses. Also, it's a partial eclipse but that isn't mentioned in the current blurb proposal. Viewership and being "in the news" doesn't mean much if it doesn't have a real impact; I suspect coverage will massively die down now that the event has concluded. Departure– (talk) 17:43, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The eclipse was a big hit with our readers yesterday – over quarter of a million of them. That was more than double the level of interest in the earthquake. The topics not getting much attention are the Sudanese items which we are blurbing. Just about no-one is interested in those. Andrew🐉(talk) 07:22, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reader 'interest' has never been an ITN criteria (the same applies to views). Breakdown of significant treaties and catastrophic earthquakes will always be of much more ITN significance than random eclipses. WP:TOP25 exists, if you want it to be featured on the Main Page start a proposal, but personal interest in pageviews should not be confounded for ITN acceptability. Gotitbro (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We'd get many more clicks if we just posted celebrity news. We're an international encyclopaedia Secretlondon (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

March 28

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime


RD: Temmy Shmull

[edit]
Article: Temmy Shmull (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Island Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Palauan politician whose death was announced a couple of days ago. Sahaib (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Richard Norton (actor)

[edit]
Article: Richard Norton (actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ABC News (Australia)
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Australian actor, martial artist and stuntman. 240F:7A:6253:1:7408:4691:F0A6:1F63 (talk) 16:43, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Heloísa Teixeira

[edit]
Article: Heloísa Teixeira (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El País obituary
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Brazilian literary critic Jaguarnik (talk) 17:50, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Short but well-cited enough. Bremps... 02:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with Bremps, no glaring CN issues and contains all the essential information. I added a few refs for some missing citations to her publications/poems. Tagging ready. FlipandFlopped 04:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Young Scooter

[edit]
Article: Young Scooter (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Billboard
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American rapper. 240F:7A:6253:1:28A1:685F:B0BB:8AF4 (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Mostly cited. Passable for posting. Bremps... 19:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 27

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime


(Posted) RD: Hans-Josef Klauck

[edit]
Article: Hans-Josef Klauck (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): University of Würzburg
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German Franciscan theologian who taught not only in Würzburg and Munich but for a long time in Chicago. He wrote standard books on New Testament and early Christianity. The article was very basic. The refs have more detail if someone has the time to add. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Ray Barra

[edit]
Article: Ray Barra (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Tanznetz
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: iconic American ballet dancer, Romeo in Cranko's Romeo and Juliet (Cranko), later ballet master, choreographer and director. The article was basically there, even two refs that looked lost just needed url update. More may come. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:55, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2025 Sagaing earthquake

[edit]
Article: 2025 Sagaing earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A magnitude 7.7 earthquake strikes Myanmar, affecting Southeast Asia and killing at least 21 people. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Nominator's comments: I know the article have the short sentence, we're gonna expanding the article for now, and the earthquake event is insane. Bakhos Let's talk! 06:51, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Even though there are no reports from Myanmar yet, there is already a news about building collapsing in Bangkok. Given how rare a significant earthquake Bangkok is, I think it might deserve a blurb. NotKringe (talk) 07:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I reckon "strikes" is a better conjugation for the blurb. With the building collapse in Thailand I think it should mention "affects Thailand" or "Southeast Asia" or something. ―Panamitsu (talk) 07:53, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support - Very strong and rare earthquake has occurred in a densely populated area, and subsequent casualty reports may be extremely severe. Nagae Iku (talk) 09:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support the quake's epicenter is basically right at Mandalay, a city of 2 million. Considering the damage done in Bangkok 1000 km away, it is unfortunately quite likely to get extremely ugly.
Strong support Major natural disaster involving many casualties ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 10:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Admins willing to post ITN: over 700 now :( Natg 19 (talk) 04:52, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to over 800 per the BBC source linked above. charlotte 👸♥ 04:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Admins willing to post ITN: over 1000 now source link from article EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 05:43, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by Schwede66 charlotte 👸♥ 05:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Admins willing to post ITN: over 1600 now, same Article as EmeraldRange 2001:9E8:DA57:3E00:D015:1C1F:9B3C:AD2E (talk) 16:02, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For small updates like that, WP:ERRORS will get you a quicker response. --PFHLai (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Arrest of Riek Machar

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Riek Machar#2025 arrest (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Vice president of South Sudan Riek Machar (pictured) and his wife, interior minister Angelina Teny, are detained, leading the SPLM-IO to declare the 2018 peace agreement void. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The SPLM-IO unilaterally voids the 2018 peace agreement after South Sudanese vice president Riek Machar (pictured) and interior minister Angelina Teny are detained.
News source(s): [3]
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Ripping up a peace deal is big. Developing Bremps... 19:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose + Close This should not be an issue, political arrests are domestic issues, although the ripping up might be an issue, still it is too soon to talk of any reprecussions, see WP:CRYSTAL Shaneapickle (talk) 19:18, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Political arrests are posted on ITN all the time. Just this month, Duterte and İmamoğlu's arrests were posted, and Yoon Suk Yeol in January. Estreyeria (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I gave my reasoning "No reprecussions have been coming out of the ripping of peace treaties or arrests" Shaneapickle (talk) 12:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Shaneapickle: please don't advocate for a close in the first comment of the nomination, however strongly you may oppose with it. Abcmaxx (talk) 12:47, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, note that the German embassy pulled out of South Sudan earlier this month due to fears of the civil war restarting. The voiding of the peace agreement would be significant enough to post regardless of the event that caused it. If the conflict restarts while this is still up, I'd support merging or pulling it.
Kowal2701 (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment As everyone is saying the end of agreement is the big thing, I would recommend the blurb be flipped to focus on this, and perhaps the agreement article should be the target. Masem (t) 22:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The issue is that we don't have a separate article for the agreement (only a section at South Sudanese Civil War, which wasn't updated), so not an ideal target for a bold link just yet. However, if it is updated before the blurb is posted/becomes stale, I would support bolding it. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:47, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Didn't make a new article, but I updated the section. Take another look? Bremps... 23:36, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Not everything needs a standalone article if the context of the topic in a larger one makes the larger one more comprehensive, and for purposes of ITN, is appropriately updated with sufficient text about the update. Editors are getting too hung up on "separate article" standards that dont exist and which harm WP by endlessly dissecting topics. — Masem (t) 11:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Could someone combine and to create one image? Bremps... 22:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Nagae Iku (talk) 10:30, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They are unconnected events so just because they take place in the same country, it doesn't make sense to combine them as it implies causality between the two. Masem (t) 18:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, they didn't even take place in the same country. Despite its name, the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-in-Opposition actually operates in South Sudan (although another split from the same original group, SPLM-N, does still operate in Sudan). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:16, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The South Sudanese gov't announced that Machar was charged with plotting rebellion. Not updated everywhere. Bremps... 02:16, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Peter Lever

[edit]
Article: Peter Lever (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Sport
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Death date not announced but his death was reported today. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not Ready + Wait References all over the place, needs fixing, I am going for wait due to fact that his death date has not been announced, Shaneapickle (talk) 15:24, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
meaning this should wait. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:25, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The date of death is not relevant to ITN, all that matters is when the death was first reported in reliable sources and the quality of the article. Thryduulf (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems well-cited enough. Bremps... 23:07, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Still Not Ready There is still alot of references jumbled up in a huge mess with no footnotes. Shaneapickle (talk) 12:36, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Upon reading and assessing the article, I agree with Bremps. It's not perfect, but all of its claims are cited with a footnote to a decent-enough sorce; it meets our typical RD standards. FlipandFlopped 02:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Battle of Khartoum

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Battle of Khartoum (2023–2025) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Sudanese Armed Forces liberate the capital city of Khartoum after nearly two years of battle. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Sudanese Armed Forces recapture Khartoum from the Rapid Support Forces after almost two years of fighting.
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Turning point in the conflict, ending one of the biggest battles in Sudanese and maybe even African history. The LIBERATION of a capital city. Vamos Palmeiras (talk) 02:34, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, a capital city changing hands meets ITN and this has lots of reliable news coverage. 675930s (talk) 05:56, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support but bear in mind that oral traditions don’t record casualty counts and rarely specific battles Kowal2701 (talk) 08:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This is covered by Ongoing and it appears that the civil war will continue as the RSF are regrouping. The blurb seems to take sides with its use of the word "liberate" and we should be wary of triumphalist propaganda issued by one side. Andrew🐉(talk) 08:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Liberate is neutral terminology. When a state reassumes control over territory it lost during the war, that is just called liberation. 675930s (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - first of all the quality is not quite there yet, some citations needed especially in the Background section. Secondly, per Andrew we certainly shouldn't be using POV language like "liberated" to describe a complex battle; I have proposed a possible ALT blurb to state what happened without taking sides. On notability, I'd say if it's definitely confirmed then probably the recapture of a capital city is blurbworthy, but I think we might need a bit more certainty from RS that the battle has definitely ended first. So far this seems to be mainly being qualified by saying it's according to Burhan rather than stated as a definite fact.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, covered by Ongoing. Angusgtw (talk) 12:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It claims that fighting has ended in Khartoum, but it should still be going as there is still fighting in the outsides of the city. But overall Propose alt blurb I think that there should also be a alt blurb stating " Sudanese Armed Forces retakes the City of Khartoum, although skirmishes going on outside the city" Shaneapickle (talk) 12:39, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The capital city has been recaptured. Yes, it is in Ongoing, but we do make exceptions for major events like that, and it is probably the most significant development that could have come out of this war. We would certainly post Kyiv being captured by Russia. Also noting that altblurb is preferable as it doesn't take sides by calling it "liberation". Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:53, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The largest city in Sudan being liberated by the government is a big deal. Lukt64 (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The recapture of the capital and largest city in Sudan during devastating war is major enough to warrant its own blurb. PrimalMustelid (talk) 14:36, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support altblurb. This is the sort of development that warrants posting a blurb.  Vanilla  Wizard 💙 14:56, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT1, as it mentions who the old party in Khartoum was. Big ramifications for Africa.
Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is "liberation" WP:NPOV? Bremps... 19:17, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bremps: In my opinion, NPOV is one of those things where the best approach is the time-tested rule of thumb: "If you have to ask..." Kurtis (talk) 15:41, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it violates WP:NPOV as one side sees the battle as liberation while another side sees it as a fall. INeedSupport :3 16:45, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes nominate this, it is a very important topic this changes almost everything. Liberate does mean to free from under occupation as from I remember. Honestly, why not. We nominate every thing that seems useless why not this? SDUpdates (talk) 20:44, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I believe the alternative blurb is better. Obviously a major turning point in this conflict and let’s not forget this battle was strategic, major, deadly and in A CAPITAL CITY! NuestroBrasil (talk) 21:03, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Look, the article isn't great, but it's somewhat passable. It's major— imagine Kyiv changed hands. It would be ideal if it were more structured, but this is okay for now. Bremps... 23:05, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2025 Indonesian protests

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Indonesian protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Nationwide protests erupt across Indonesia in response to the passage of a controversial military law expanding the armed forces' role in governance. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Demonstrations intensify throughout Indonesia following the enactment of legislation increasing military involvement in civilian government roles.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Rising cases of crackdown against freedom of speech, kidnappings, and fears of militarization spark mass protests across Indonesia.
Alternative blurb III: Nationwide protests against the revision of the Indonesian National Armed Forces Law, which expanded the role of the military, erupted in Indonesia.
News source(s): South China Morning Post, Financial Times, Jakarta Post
Credits:

Nominator's comments: The passage of this law has led to significant public outcry and nationwide demonstrations. Initiated by Indonesian students, it draws concerns over democratic erosion in Indonesia. Article recently changed from 2025 Indonesian Student Protest to 2025 Indonesian Protests due to the prolonged and recently widened scale of the protest to which has reached its second phase and across all 5 major islands. Kaliper1 (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose + Wait This is a domestic protest, we only put the serbian one due to alot of reprecussions it had in the balkans, it is too early to say if there is going to be reprecussions to these protests Shaneapickle (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Relevant and important event due to the democratic erosion fears. Even if it is not as "unconstitutional" as the 2025 Turkish protests , which was nominated and posted for ITN btw, it is still notable enough to list into a potential future "2025 Global Spring Protests" article and could still have an effect to the ASEAN (Southeast Asia) regional area, due to Indonesia's size and presence, politically and economically. (P.S. Don't bring up Singapore) SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 15:09, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think this nomination should wait as we have not seen any reprecussions outside of indonesia. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:12, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The protests has been ongoing for about a week and occured in the context of a greater act of opposition, which has began since last year. The economic effects are apparent with the falling prices of the IDX Composite several days ago. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 15:15, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just would like to add that the mentioned "greater act of opposition since last year" was the 2024 Indonesian local election law protests/Emergency Alert for Indonesia Protests, which even this current 2025 protest also use the same symbol (Indonesian national symbol with an EAS aesthetic background) , but now with different color (previously blue, now black).
Many local Indonesian even consider the current protest as the sequel to the previous 2024 one. SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 16:59, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per SymphonyWizard72's comment. Addressing Shaneapickle's comment, there has been international repercussions, with Indonesian stock prices falling dramatically and condemnation from Reporters Without Borders on the ongoing police violence. There has also been some response from the UN special rapporteur Mary Lawlor. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 15:11, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support significant and relevant protest. Scuba 15:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now, it has become a long chain of demonstrations with many persecutions occurring. Significant events have taken place during the protests, and they are still ongoing. Namesk1Y (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the Turkish ones was posted. ArionStar (talk) 15:46, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the protest wave has recently heightened again in the capital city Sididukubanyak (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The current ALT1 "military involvement in civilian government roles" has odd wording (did you mean "civil government") that took me some time to comprehend. Meanwhile, "expanding the armed forces' role in governance" in ALT0 immediately understandable and we should it change to that. Hugoaway (talk) 12:27, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's similar euphemisms in the article. Secretlondon (talk) 14:43, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Christina McKelvie

[edit]
Article: Christina McKelvie (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News Sky News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Scottish Government Minister who served in several ministerial positions. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Seems well-cited enough if a bit short. Bremps... 06:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents:

  1. ^ "Timberwolves-Pistons fight: 7 ejected in brawl". Fox 9. March 30, 2025. Retrieved March 31, 2025.
  2. ^ "Donte DiVincenzo in middle of ugly Timberwolves-Pistons brawl". New York Post. March 30, 2025. Retrieved March 31, 2025.
  3. ^ "Pistons-Timberwolves brawl: NBA punishment looming?". The Sun. March 30, 2025. Retrieved March 31, 2025.
  4. ^ "Timberwolves bounce back after brawl, pull away from Pistons". Star Tribune. March 30, 2025. Retrieved March 31, 2025.
  5. ^ "Timberwolves vs. Pistons - Game Summary". ESPN. March 30, 2025. Retrieved March 31, 2025.